From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan  6 22:55:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA20252
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 22:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (schizo.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA20247
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 22:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mrcpu@localhost) by schizo.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA02856; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 22:57:23 -0800
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 22:57:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Newer mildly amusing problem.
In-Reply-To: <199601070645.RAA27709@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960106225702.11047G-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


Well, I ended up reformatting it with 8k blocks and it works fine.

On Sun, 7 Jan 1996, Bruce Evans wrote:

> >20GB RAID array formatted with "newfs -b 4096 -f 512", on a 2.1-stable.
> 
> >Note the df output:
> 
> >/dev/sd4c               15844158        0 -6898211    -0%    /mnt
> 
> >I hope it's just an incorrect format specifier in a print statement, but 
> 
> No, the count of available blocks must be wrong.
> 
> Look at output from `dumpfs /dev/rsd4c' for more details.
> 
> Bruce
>