From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 20:47:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D64106564A for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cracauer@koef.zs64.net) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50308FC22 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by koef.zs64.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2IKlk4F059797 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:47:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@koef.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by koef.zs64.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2IKlkoD059796 for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:46 -0400 From: Martin Cracauer To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100318204746.GA57903@cons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: FreeBSD on Xen with hw virtualization support X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:49 -0000 I never got this so I rather ask: Xen should run OS kernels unmodified (compared to their native hardware versions) if you have hardware virtualization support in the CPU. Why doesn't this cover FreeBSD? I am missing something here. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/