From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 25 13:41:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A9D106568A for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@greenfinch.com) Received: from web161.extendcp.co.uk (web161.extendcp.co.uk [79.170.40.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2B88FC15 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@greenfinch.com) Received: from www.greenfinch.com (web161.extendcp.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by web161.extendcp.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8PCjkit006744 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:45:46 +0100 Received: from 82.2.227.241 (SquirrelMail authenticated user philip@greenfinch.com) by www.greenfinch.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:45:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <63088.82.2.227.241.1222346746.squirrel@www.greenfinch.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:45:46 +0100 (BST) From: philip@greenfinch.com To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: 7.1-BETA disk kernel message X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:41:46 -0000 Hi folks, I'm getting a lot of these messages on my 7.1-BETA system, which has just one drive installed: mpt0: port 0x9800-0x98ff mem 0xfcbfc000-0xfcbfffff,0xfcbe0000-0xfcbeffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci7 mpt0: [ITHREAD] mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.16.0 mpt0: Capabilities: ( RAID-0 RAID-1E RAID-1 ) mpt0: 0 Active Volumes (2 Max) mpt0: 0 Hidden Drive Members (14 Max) ... mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 128 mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 128 mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 128 mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x00 Depth 128 ... etc Should I be worried about these, is it something that's likely to be fixed for the production release? Thanks, Philip