From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 12 5:23:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leaf.lumiere.net (leaf.lumiere.net [207.218.152.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC78715226 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:23:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from j@leaf.lumiere.net) Received: (from j@localhost) by leaf.lumiere.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) id FAA00215; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 05:21:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Jesse To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps: badlist and other problems In-Reply-To: <3711E02F.3E4C68A@newsguy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? Or at least what I can do to > > get more info? > > Could it possibly be a problem with procfs? Is procfs mounted on > /proc? Is it on the fstab? Is it on the kernel? Loaded as a kld? > Does /proc exist? And, anyway, does ps works with newly-compiled > GENERIC kernel? I know next to nothing about /proc, so I can't answer that first question. /proc is mounted (4 1k-blocks, 4 used, 0 avail, 100% capacity). It's in /etc/fstab. 'options PROCFS' in the kernel. /proc exists. I think I tested with a newly compiled GENERIC kernel, but I'll compile again to be absolutely sure. As for klm/lkm, that may be something: # modstat modstat: /dev/lkm: Device not configured /dev/lkm exists though. --- Jesse http://www.lumiere.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message