From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  7 23:43:12 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169071065686
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 23:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell.rawbw.com (shell.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD268FC13
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 23:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from eagle.syrec.org (c-67-188-126-36.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
	[67.188.126.36]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by shell.rawbw.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m97Ni3Hl047054;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48EBF40D.5050807@rawbw.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:43:09 -0700
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081001)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
References: <48EBCC75.1040908@rawbw.com>
	<20081007222528.GA60058@icarus.home.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20081007222528.GA60058@icarus.home.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Strange memory/cpu behavior
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: yuri@rawbw.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:43:12 -0000

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Regarding the "memory bloat", what field in top(1) are you basing this
> on?
>   

For the total CPU usage I used
CPU: 100.0% user Active... all others were zeros.
For the process CPU I looked at WCPU.

Yuri