Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:02:02 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: Nick Gustas <tychl@txf.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Subject: Re: ppp redial unsuccessful Message-ID: <20061006180202.GB1406@roadrunner.q.local> In-Reply-To: <45243F7E.8050708@mail.txf.com> References: <20061004185148.GA1848@roadrunner.q.local> <20061004185911.GA94703@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20061004190611.GB1848@roadrunner.q.local> <45240D81.2080506@mail.txf.com> <20061004212417.GA95104@epia2.farid-hajji.net> <20061004213909.GC1848@roadrunner.q.local> <45243F7E.8050708@mail.txf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nick Gustas wrote: > Oct 4 19:03:09 xxxxxxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Authenticate > Oct 4 19:03:09 xxxxxxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: deflink: his = PAP, mine = none > Oct 4 19:03:09 xxxxxxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: Pap Output: xxxxxxx@ameritech.net ******** > Oct 4 19:03:09 xxxxxxx ppp[55]: tun0: LCP: deflink: RecvCodeRej(127) state = Opened > Oct 4 19:03:11 xxxxxxx ppp[55]: tun0: Phase: Pap Input: SUCCESS () > > The real question is, is there's a way to work around your provider's brokenness without > killing the ppp process? Hi Nick, I cranked up the debug logging, and compared my ppp login attempts with your logfile. I get multiple Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(12) state = Initial Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 213.191.89.20 Oct 6 18:29:43 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: RecvConfigReq(13) state = Initial Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: IPADDR[6] 213.191.89.20 Oct 6 18:29:46 coyote ppp[67945]: tun0: IPCP: deflink: Oops, RCR in Initial. Using "Google Search" then led me to the follow posts [1], that describe the problem in more detail. 'disable ipv6cp' should do the trick, I'll check this ASAP. Thanks for your pointer! [1] http://www.freebsd.de/archive/de-bsd-questions/de-bsd-questions.200506/0029.html http://tech.barwick.de/openbsd/deflink-oops-rcr-in-initial.html Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061006180202.GB1406>