From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jul 25 12:27:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA19698
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.ott.igs.net (root@host.ott.igs.net [206.248.16.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19693
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elmo (ttyA10.ott.igs.net [206.248.17.18]) by host.ott.igs.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA10037 for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <33D8FF0C.7D6B@physics.uottawa.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:31:24 -0400
From: Sylvain Hubert <hubert@physics.uottawa.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: fortran compiler
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

I am testing the f2c compiler on a PentiumPro (freeBSD OS) and
it seems that the optimization is not very efficient. It
might be because I do not use the proper options. I only try the
option -O3 for optimization.

Do someone knows how to optimize a fortan code for a Pentium Pro,
in other word, what options should I put?

Or, do someone knows of any good fortran compiler for a PentiumPro 
chip?

Thank you in advance for any reply!

Sylvain...