From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 24 22:39:02 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA08465 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 22:39:02 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA08454 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 22:38:55 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA26789; Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:42:55 -0700 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1995 23:42:55 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503250642.XAA26789@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Amancio Hasty "Re: httpd as part of the system." (Mar 24, 5:23pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Amancio Hasty Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I would like to propose that we add the following two components to our > > system in an effort to both: ... > 3. exmh (a tcl/tk wrapper for mh it also understands MIME) Why would we add a tool to mh as part of the standard system when mh is NOT part of the standard system? It seems kind of foolish to me. (And NO, we're not going to add specific mailers to the distribution. It's already been hashed out and decided that choice of mailers is a religious issue best left up to the user) Nate