From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Nov 10 01:11:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA15626 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:11:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from cam.grad.kiev.ua ([195.5.25.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA15611 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 01:11:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua) Received: from Shevchenko.kiev.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam.grad.kiev.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA20546; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:06:30 GMT Message-ID: <3466F8C4.1A3F3A1A@Shevchenko.kiev.ua> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:06:29 +0000 From: Ruslan Shevchenko X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03b8 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amancio Hasty CC: chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Could FreeBSD be a viable platform for large SQL/SAP/etc enterprise applications? References: <199711100637.WAA00667@rah.star-gate.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Amancio Hasty wrote: > ? Amancio Hasty wrote: > ? > ? ? ? ? for clients -- if you love Unix -- then Linux. > ? ? ? > ? ? ? I'd say you must be joking, but based on the accuracy of the rest of > ? ? ? your response, this is perfectly in character. > ? ? ? > ? ? > ? ? His posting was just flame bait . > ? ? > ? > ? No, it is not flame. It is real problem. > ? > ? > > Care to elaborate? > I can't uderstood you. The question was: is the FreeBSD commerce-usable system. I explore my opinion, without flames. Then I receive un-argumentable flame. About Linux --- it have the same problems, expect jdk support a little better. ( I, prefer FreeBSD ;) ) My answer was not aggressive. But I received reaction in style : "Only, that you must say, is that the FreeBSD is the best OS in the world, all other senetences are flame" I think that such point of view it is not right. So, let's be more tolerant. > Amancio