From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Mar 8 17:30:42 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC845504CD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:30:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DvQNK4sWgz4v7T for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 128HUkkW014157 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:30:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.16.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 128HUjrF014156; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:30:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:30:45 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPi4 Status and xorg behavior Message-ID: <20210308173045.GB13739@www.zefox.net> References: <20210307021628.GA99890@www.zefox.net> <20210307155515.GA4591@www.zefox.net> <67BF2EAC-04AD-4822-99B2-48A99563331F@yahoo.com> <4B963C56-D7E9-42FE-8B8B-B8A425ACE78F@yahoo.com> <20210308011035.GA6603@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DvQNK4sWgz4v7T X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[50.1.20.27:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:30:42 -0000 On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:40:06PM +0100, Klaus K??chemann wrote: > > > > it would also help to be explicit about the firmware-version. > I would suggest to base tests on - 1.20210303. - , as it should then be the > latest in the next build , IIRC. > Is there some way to check it from FreeBSD? The machine usually runs RaspiOS and was updated yesterday, so I'd expect the firmware to be reasonably current but can't be certain. Thanks for reading! bob prohaska