From owner-cvs-all Thu Oct 12 16:22: 7 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from diskfarm.firehouse.net (rdu25-12-043.nc.rr.com [24.25.12.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCC437B503 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from abc@localhost) by diskfarm.firehouse.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9CNOTW51935; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:24:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from abc) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:24:29 -0400 From: Alan Clegg To: Peter Wemm Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <20001012192429.K47252@diskfarm.firehouse.net> References: <20001012143415.C47252@diskfarm.firehouse.net> <200010122222.e9CMMmG35106@netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200010122222.e9CMMmG35106@netplex.com.au>; from peter@netplex.com.au on Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 03:22:48PM -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unless the network is lying to me again, Peter Wemm said: > Alan Clegg wrote: > > I'd recommend just adding 'sendmail -q' to cron, and I'd also suggest > > that if the given method is documented correctly (and I'm sure everyone > > documents their systems correctly), no admin worth their salt would > > have any problem what-so-ever. Please be aware that I do not advocate running sendmail this way. Infact, I don't advocate running sendmail, but that is a completely different issue. My point was that with proper documentation, even systems with ugly, open sores can be dealt with. AlanC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message