From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 16 06:15:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE24D10656DE for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:15:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A72C8FC0C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6G6FVl5004802; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q6G6FVdm004799; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <64329.1342378317@tristatelogic.com> <20120715214823.679eb23d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120715162333.45b82082@scorpio> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:15:31 +0200 (CEST) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:15:36 -0000 On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> totally in error. SpinRite will attempt to read a damage sector up to >>> 2000 times and through different algorithms determine what is most >>> >> >> man dd >> > > Even better, > > recoverdisk /dev/da0 /dev/da1 true :)