From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 12 00:21:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA15567 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from rah.star-gate.com ([209.133.7.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA15550 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:21:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04349; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199801120821.AAA04349@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org cc: Mike Smith , thyerm@camtech.net.au, current@freebsd.org, Studded@dal.net, kong@kkk.ml.org, Alex Nash Subject: Re: Firewall in kernel? - Found it! In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Jan 1998 23:42:06 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:21:07 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > If the concensus is that the current system is oh so very well, and needs > no further improvement, then I humbly apologize and withraw my offer. Well, if it can improve or increase our current build process then I would say it is worth it go for it. There is more to that little tiny statement -- I can say that one major company in the valley honorable checking process almost spun out of control and it took several million dollars to get themselves out of the mess they created it. So if an automatic check-in and verify process can be placed it can improve our productivity. Also, it will be way cool to have a world-wide network for check-in, verify and build 8) Cheers, Amancio