From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 2 8:55: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C683D37B8D4 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:54:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from babolo@links.ru) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA28228; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:54:46 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <200006021554.TAA28228@aaz.links.ru> Subject: Re: Q about the priority of a port update In-Reply-To: <20000602115057.S32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com> from "Will Andrews" at "Jun 2, 0 11:50:57 am" To: andrews@technologist.com (Will Andrews) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:54:46 +0400 (MSD) Cc: ejs@bfd.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews writes: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 08:35:38AM -0700, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote: > > So, do I submit a critical port update for a port that isn't critical? > > The fix is to patch one of the patches in lsh/patches, as I'm almost > > totally rewriting the lsh-authorize script in the first place due to heavy > > bash dependancy. > No port is really "critical". :-> ... unless security is broken ... > Just send in your update and I will be glad to commit it for you. -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message