Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:34:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Patch to protect process from pageout killing Message-ID: <XFMail.20030325113450.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200303241805.38175.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25-Mar-2003 Wes Peters wrote: > On Monday 24 March 2003 08:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Also, doesn't this result in the flag being inerited with fork() and >> thereby negating the effect you are seeking for squid ? > > I looked through all the places in kern_fork.c where p2->p_flag gets set > and didn't see anything that looked like it would inherit P_PROTECTED > from p1->p_flag. Did I miss something? I'm obviously a bit of a > neophyte in this part of the kernel. rlimit's are inherited. However, due to a "feature" bug in your patch, the P_PROTECTED flag doesn't get turned on when the rlimit is inherited in fork1(). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030325113450.jhb>