From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 5 05:14:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF4916A41F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 05:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2143D48 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 05:14:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6435C7D9D; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:14:54 -0500 (EST) References: <17339.61532.649959.1059@canoe.dclg.ca> <17340.41997.290075.251660@canoe.dclg.ca> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: David Gilbert Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:14:54 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ISP Subject: Re: FreeBSD +NFS + mail services X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 05:14:55 -0000 David Gilbert writes: Darren Pilgrim > It does seem like most of them arn't used. I'd say your number is > somewhere between 4 and 8, but considering that these are just kernel > threads, having 20 around may not be costing you enough to worry. > Certainly, you don't require more. I am more concerned with having more connections than needed on the server... specially as the number of clients increase. Thanks to Darren Pilgrim I decreased sysctl vfs.nfs.iodmaxidle to 30 instead of 120. That way those nfs client programs will only wait 30 seconds of idle time before dissapearing. I am also considering setting the upper limit for clients to 10. > but I seem to remember running nfsd with a larger -n argument starting > mroe daemons ... but that might not be FreeBSD. The server side is > certainly less dynamic. Thanks. Will try that on a test machine.