From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 16:30:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9085916A4CE; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:30:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qubesoft.com (gate.qubesoft.com [217.169.36.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE3843D2F; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@qubesoft.com) Received: from [192.168.1.254] (dhcp254.qubesoft.com [192.168.1.254]) by mail.qubesoft.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j14GUZXD023282; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:30:35 GMT (envelope-from dfr@qubesoft.com) In-Reply-To: <20050204.091426.98415585.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <420322CA.3090201@root.org> <84e9ba659174ea3f7c7b2930c0ae3759@xcllnt.net> <20050204.091426.98415585.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5539563a425020d35ef1878057f4f85d@qubesoft.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Rabson Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:30:36 +0000 To: "M. Warner Losh" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on mail.qubesoft.com cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: marcel@xcllnt.net cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ia64/ia64 machdep.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:30:54 -0000 On 4 Feb 2005, at 16:14, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <84e9ba659174ea3f7c7b2930c0ae3759@xcllnt.net> > Marcel Moolenaar writes: > : > I'm not sure if my approach is correct -- should different drivers > for > : > the same hardware share the same devclass? > : > : A datapoint: sio(4) and uart(4) are different drivers for the same > : hardware. > : They don't share the devclass. > > Neither do they share the same name. Just to make things clear, if two drivers use the same name, they will always share the devclass automatically (whether or not they use the same variable to reference the devclass) and will allocate non-conflicting unit numbers. >