From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 14 21:56:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A64BF2A for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [8.8.178.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7B8FC19 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9ELuxjk027699 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:59 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9ELuxJb027697 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:59 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 10602 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2012 16:56:58 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.115?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.115) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 14 Oct 2012 16:56:58 -0500 Message-ID: <507B3527.90500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:56:55 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen Subject: Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released References: <20120830141939.GJ64447@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:59 -0000 On 8/30/2012 10:43 AM, John Nielsen wrote: > Portupgrade doesn't remove the pkgdb.db.lock reliably. > Portupgrade doesn't handle stale lock files (just waits indefinitely for a nonexistent process to finish). A big problem when combined with the above. I have not run into these issues. Do you have any more information on how to reproduce? Thanks, Bryan