From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 18 20:36:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945E8106566C for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B298FC0A for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.2.164] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:36:55 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::1 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Message-ID: <49C15B66.30007@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:36:54 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipfreak@yahoo.com References: <952823.44044.qm@web52107.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <952823.44044.qm@web52107.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: carp and duplicated echo replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:36:56 -0000 gahn wrote: > My two servers have carp configured and work fine. but the pings directed to the virtual interface (carp interface for both server) result duplicated replies: > > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.016 ms (DUP!) > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.035 ms (DUP!) > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.016 ms > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.015 ms (DUP!) > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms > 64 bytes from 172.20.1.25: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.014 ms (DUP!) > ... > > Is that normal? VRRP virtual interface don't seem to behave that way. > No, that's not normal. Are you sure that you specified different advskews for the carp interfaces on both servers? Do the interfaces both display that they are in MASTER status, or is one in BACKUP mode?