Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:43:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Isely <isely@enteract.com> To: Timothy Reaves <treaves@silverfields.com> Cc: 'aic7xxx' <aic7xxx@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: driver / kernel ignores TEST UNIT READY command]] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106220941120.8920-100000@shell-3.enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <3B335705.3020809@silverfields.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Because the AIC7895 could be running a lot *faster*... Or at least it is
probably exhibiting behavior with relative timing that is different.
That's the fun thing when one is chasing race conditions.
-Mike
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> Fine, but I'm still left asking why it is that all of his other customers
> that use the 2.4.4 kernel are having no trouble? According to him I'm
> the only person reportedly using the AIC7895 chipset. That is the only
> difference.
>
>
>
> Andy Kennedy wrote:
>
> > Ah yes, your friend may have been writing device drivers for 20 years, but
> > NOT ON LINUX!
> >
> > I've been writing device drivers on Linux for 8 years, and what you have
> > been told make sense.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-aic7xxx@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-aic7xxx@FreeBSD.ORG]On
> > Behalf Of Timothy Reaves
> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:10 AM
> > To: aic7xxx
> > Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: driver / kernel ignores TEST UNIT READY command]]
> >
> >
> > Is everyone ready for the next round?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe aic7xxx" in the body of the message
>
>
| Mike Isely | PGP fingerprint
POSITIVELY NO | | 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92
UNSOLICITED JUNK MAIL! | isely @ pobox (dot) com | 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8
| (spam-foiling address) |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe aic7xxx" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0106220941120.8920-100000>