From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Oct 21 04:55:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB0EA1AF3A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDDE1A50 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9L4teOg070673 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:55:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 203909] [MAINTAINER] devel/sope: Add CFLAGS supressing compiler warnings Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:55:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-patch, needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: euan@potensol.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 04:55:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203909 --- Comment #3 from Euan Thoms --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1) The CFLAGS are purely for my testing and development purposes. They should be commented out in the official port. I have them on seperate lines so that I can easily toggle them individually as I include/exclude different types of warnings. Since the build stops as soon as it hits the first warning. I can modify as you suggest if I have to. The only reason I left them in there is so that I don't lose track of them. Adding a comment about the upstream process, as you suggest, is a good idea. Yes, I am in the process of getting these upstream. I have already contacted the lead developer and he is very accommodating so far. Since there are a lot of patches and some platform / build environment issues which potentially conflict with the support of old RHEL versions, it may take some time. I'm doing it in stages. David Chisnall has been helping me with this process so far. There is not one single pull request, there is only one so far, since I'm doing it in stages. There will be more to come in the couple of weeks I imagine. But it may happen faster, I can't tell. In the meantime, I'd like to get the port for version 2.3.2 updated. The upstream changes will filter down into new versions over time. It may be a while before the next release. And the next release may be the first of the 3.x series, which I think I heard, has a new UI. This could pose some problems in itself. Perhaps we'll have to create a legacy port for 2.x. I for one will not be moving my user base to a new UI so soon. I will stay on 2.3.x for some time yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.