From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 16 10:15:31 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA08952 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 10:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cypher.net (black@zen.pratt.edu [205.232.115.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA08946 for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 10:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from black@localhost) by cypher.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id MAA11977; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:28:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 12:28:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: "David S. Miller" , thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk oh, israel has its share of black helicopters, but i think that has nothing to do with MOSIX licensing. On Fri, 16 May 1997, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 1997, Ben Black wrote: > > > i think the real reason for the 6 CPU limit has been suggested. > > commercial release. note the lack of black helicopters for that explanation. > > > > b3n > > > Funds for MOSIX came from the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and the > Ministry of Science (and Energy?)...I think there are some black > helicopters over there. > > Pedro. > > > > On Fri, 16 May 1997, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:40:13 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Ben Black > > > > > > the current RC5 distributed cracking effort shows quite clearly > > > that something as advanced as MOSIX is not required. if his logic > > > is that bad guys will use MOSIX to crack encryption brute force > > > then he is fooling himself. > > > > > > And besides, as far as MO6 goes, all I have to say is that adb is your > > > friend... > > > > > >