From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 12 10:52:06 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED501106568D
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:52:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CE18FC08
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:52:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFBF14D9854;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com
Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id mA64p0jtXCE0; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:52:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-89-132-179-104.catv.broadband.hu
	[89.132.179.104])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6A514D9853;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:52:01 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4AD30A4B.7060409@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:51:55 +0200
From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <20091011145021.GG36937@acme.spoerlein.net>	<20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl>
	<4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org> <8663aksy43.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <8663aksy43.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:52:07 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav escribió:
> Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>   
>> What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities,
>> which actually have higher WARNS-compliance.
>>     
>
> WARNS level 0 is the current default.  All Ulrich's patch does is
> reverse the logic so that WARNS is 6 by default and anything that didn't
> already set WARNS explicitly sets it to 0, so the actual value of WARNS
> in each Makefile is the same as before.  This is orthogonal to actually
> fixing whatever doesn't currently build at a higher WARNS level.
>   
Yep, I understand that but what I'm saying is that once we are dealing 
with such a big patch, it would be nice to elaborate the highest WARNS 
level of each utility and set them accordingly, which doesn't require 
too much extra effort as opposed to making all of them WARNS=6 compliant.

-- 
Gabor Kovesdan
FreeBSD Volunteer

EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org
WEB:   http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org