From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 9 02:13:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6740508 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 02:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.server.rpi.edu (smtp9.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7602269 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 02:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth1.server.rpi.edu (smtp-auth1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.231]) by smtp9.server.rpi.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s692Dmam011052; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:13:48 -0400 Received: from smtp-auth1.server.rpi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-auth1.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E775811A; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [129.161.61.88] (biotech-lower-wl-329.dynamic2.rpi.edu [129.161.61.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: healer) by smtp-auth1.server.rpi.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F22A5801B; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <53BCA55E.1080101@rpi.edu> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:13:50 -0400 From: Bob Healey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Interactions with mxge, pf, nfsd, and the kernel References: <53B42139.302@rpi.edu> <53BBEECD.6000709@rpi.edu> <20140708132531.GI2586@home.opsec.eu> <53BBF25E.40808@rpi.edu> <20140708194416.GJ2586@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140708194416.GJ2586@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outgoing, @@RPTN) X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Hold at 15.10] X-CanIt-Incident-Id: 02Mo2dMjX X-CanIt-Geo: ip=129.161.61.88; country=US; region=Connecticut; city=Hartford; latitude=41.7637; longitude=-72.6851; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=41.7637,-72.6851&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.229 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 02:13:56 -0000 In this particular instance, the 1G interface was still functioning. The 10G interface was mostly not functioning, but any packets received on either were valid. Bob Healey Systems Administrator Biocomputation and Bioinformatics Constellation and Molecularium healer@rpi.edu (518) 276-4407 On 7/8/2014 3:44 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> For an unscientific test, tcpdump -i bce1 for ~5 seconds gave these stats: >> >> 321 packets captured >> 53776 packets received by filter >> 52703 packets dropped by kernel > So, the interface still receives/sends ? What happens if you > > ifconfig bce1 down > ifconfig bce1 up > > ? Are the packets valid or not ? >