From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 27 11:37:50 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10337B401; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E26443E88; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:37:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18H807-0003Zk-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:37:35 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18H807-0003Z7-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:37:35 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gARJcarR007101; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:38:41 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gARJcZKT007087; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:38:35 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:38:35 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Robert Watson , "Tim J. Robbins" , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netsmb smb_trantcp.c Message-ID: <20021127193835.GA71964@regency.nsu.ru> References: <1038360022.9582.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1038360022.9582.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Envelope-To: doconnor@gsoft.com.au, rwatson@freebsd.org, tjr@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:50:22AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:32, Robert Watson wrote: > > Tim, thanks for working on this! Do we know what shape we're in now WRT > > smbfs stability and functionality generally? Can I check off smbfs > > entirely in our TODO list, or is this just a piece of the picture? > > AFAIK smbfs still (at least in stable) requires you to umount a given > mount point 3-5 times before it will unmount (gives EBUSY before then). I confirm. There are also problems with creating localized (i.e., russian) filenames (they are not properly recoded), and stat()ing them doesn't work either (and thus I can't play those damn movies!). Also, I *think* that security type "share" does not work. I'll debug and possibly fix some of issues, however, I don't have enough time to and hardware to set up "tear-it-apart" box and tinker with it right now. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message