From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 6 14:16:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (btw-xl1.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98D215755 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:16:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com) Received: from software-munitions.com (fwiw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.157]) by btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA10093; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:15:19 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us: Host fwiw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.157] claimed to be software-munitions.com Message-ID: <387513F7.73F33939@software-munitions.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 14:15:19 -0800 From: Dennis Glatting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Bihan-Faou , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th References: <200001060927.UAA03779@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <006001bf586a$409b4b00$c80aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > Maybe I am wrong, but it seems to me that there is already quite a bit of > IPv6 and IPSec stuff in the tree. Most of the kernel stuff is there (albeit > seriously lacking documentation). To me this is not *too* critical right > now. I see the point for the research community though. > Speaking with my Infrastructure Services hat on, if 4.0 supported IPsec on IPv4 I would deploy FreeBSD more widely. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message