Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 03:40:18 -0600 From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> To: Yuet-nan Wong via freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: U[dating Bind912 wants ghostscript? Message-ID: <29BCD448-1AD4-4DF0-8FC1-42AD241376A5@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <f0b8e0e5-02a6-294a-0e75-4660f1a9035e@gwdg.de> References: <227B398C-9070-45E8-9B96-858762750BC5@kreme.com> <f0b8e0e5-02a6-294a-0e75-4660f1a9035e@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07 Sep 2018, at 02:44, Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wrote: > Am 07.09.18 um 09:46 schrieb @lbutlr: >>=20 >> Were does this dependency on doxygen come from, and why does that = then want to install ghostscript and tex? > devel/protobuf-c seems to be the culprit: >=20 > OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D DOXYGEN > OPTIONS_DEFAULT=3D DOXYGEN Thank you, I was about to post back that I=E2=80=99d found it. Changed the options for ptoyobuf-c to not install the documentation and = reinstalled without tex and Ghostscript. --=20 The voice of the majority is no proof of justice.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29BCD448-1AD4-4DF0-8FC1-42AD241376A5>