From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 9 04:17:26 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA26998 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 04:17:26 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA26992 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 04:17:25 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id NAA13517 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:17:23 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id NAA17084 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:17:22 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507091117.NAA17084@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: Version numbers of the different branches? To: peter@haywire.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:17:22 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3tmvu7$fo7$1@haywire.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Jul 9, 95 06:13:27 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 444 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > How about making it either "2.2-BUILT-xxxxxx" or "2.X-BUILT-xxxxx" or > even "2.X-CURRENT-xxxxxx". > We should revert to something like it was before e.g. 2.2-Development. Putting the build date is not really informative because it gives no insight about the date of the files themselves... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995