From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 17:22:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DB116A41F; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:22:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E81D43D48; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:22:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77HLBSB082147; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:21:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:22:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050807.112215.83519787.imp@bsdimp.com> To: cperciva@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <42F63113.5020600@freebsd.org> References: <20050807.211240.75793221.hrs@allbsd.org> <20050807.100211.20316746.imp@bsdimp.com> <42F63113.5020600@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:21:12 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:22:52 -0000 In message: <42F63113.5020600@freebsd.org> Colin Percival writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : > However, one possible gotcha in setting this up is licensing. Do you : > know that your distribution of binary snapshot complies with the GPL : > which requires that you also provide the sources when you do this? : > The project already has some issues with GPLd ports when it builds : > binaries. Are distfiles part of portsnap? If so, then you are safe : > for the standard licenses... : : Huh? Isn't the ports tree BSD-licensed? I keep seeing snapshots and build. I still don't know if this distributes sources or binaries. My concern was if it distributed binaries. The tree itself has no license, but is presuemed to be BSD-license. The actual binaries built from the tree, however, have a zillion different licenses... Warner