From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 16:42:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48D216A403 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A806813C458 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F11085C8FD; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:21:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59115-02; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:21:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9632085C8E8; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:21:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC393C170; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:21:25 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:21:25 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Csaba Henk , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <4746DA006C148BC0FF1241C6@ganymede.hub.org> <45CCECCB7ECB612F504211F3@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: TDFS ... or other distributed file system technologies for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:42:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, March 29, 2007 13:49:43 +0000 Csaba Henk wrote: > So, whom to pester about getting fuse4bsd merged?... My question ... if this was added to the core system (or, rather, the BSD/kernel module), if it something that you are willing/able to support if there are any problems and/or ensure that bit rot doesn't set in? Basically, if it gets added, will it just have to be removed within a release or two because it doesn't build/work anymore? :( - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGFnOF4QvfyHIvDvMRArV/AKC5tIathrjmm4+0m/EA96Xci7rldQCgoAVm GBfKduqCmfdo7sdwx7m7STg= =Te7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----