Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:23:25 -0500 From: Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allow user install Message-ID: <4FEB256D.6000700@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <86hatxw4rf.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20120626063017.D05DA58081@chaos.jnpr.net> <86wr2uwdgf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <C31B93F4-674C-4183-9F3F-5F7C48980204@kientzle.com> <4FE9D84E.7080402@vangyzen.net> <86hatxw4rf.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/27/2012 03:14, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Eric van Gyzen<eric@vangyzen.net> writes: >> Tim's idea sounds great, and would cover several use-cases. >> Specifically, it leaves the build artifacts in the usual places so >> other, later builds can build against them, whereas writing the >> artifacts directly to a tar file does not. > > I'm not sure what you mean. The "build artifacts" would still be in the > obj tree. But they would be in a different directory layout than an installed FreeBSD system. It would be convenient to tell other builds to look for headers and libraries in the usual paths, but rooted in $DESTDIR, not on the build host. Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FEB256D.6000700>