Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:39:29 -0400 From: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_vlan subinterfaces at boot Message-ID: <48576A31.7040008@ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <48575520.708@ibctech.ca> References: <4856FE0B.8030901@ibctech.ca> <48570503.2030608@ibctech.ca> <20080617003216.GA34683@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <485708D1.7060401@ibctech.ca> <485711D8.70308@ibctech.ca> <20080617044706.GA36170@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <48575520.708@ibctech.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > If anyone can provide me with information on specific working groups or > locations that I can directly obtain information for certain areas > without disturbing the list, I would be appreciative. > > Currently, I am deeply focused on the above, and: > > - 7.0 and IPv6 jails > - work/compliance within the scope of RFC 4861 & 4862 > - implementation regarding RFC 3484 > - how a user (granted, 'user' in this case fully understands that most > all hands on deck are not paid for their 'job') can find out when/if > drafts are being considered: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-ps-08.txt > I'd like to thank those who have emailed me off-list regarding my inquiries. I have been provided information regarding my general questions that large portions of certain specifications are either already in -current, or are in the process to be added to the tree. To those who responded: thank you. I'm ecstatic about implementing the new changes so I can compare them to the current standards and I-Ds. Nice to know that the underlying changes will aid in my IPv4 goals, but at the same time push forward my 'one small step' toward IPv6 compliance (even though I am still in a pocket). Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48576A31.7040008>