Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:39:16 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, hamellr@heorot.1nova.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email question Message-ID: <15047.37364.766670.386170@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <3AC627DF.BE011F45@nisser.com> References: <15045.24947.102841.710362@guru.mired.org> <3AC627DF.BE011F45@nisser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> types: > > FWIW, The World was recently sued for damages because their spam > > scanners dropped some non-spam mail. The court upheld their right to > > do this. > Yeah, well, personally I feel that the best solution is to define a > clear policy, publish it good - i.e. circumvent the 'but how could I > know?' - have legal eyes check it over and implement it. It's hard to have a clear policy for rules that are changing on a regular basis. Stating that you do filter in the TOS - which all users have agreed to follow and so presumably read, right? - should do. Actually, the claimant tried this in that case. The World asked if anyone knew the security rules used by their phone company, and that pretty much killed that argument. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15047.37364.766670.386170>