Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:37:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 278525] emulators/wine: /usr/local/share/wine/pkg32.sh error updating repositories Message-ID: <bug-278525-7788-lr7aWEbdq1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-278525-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-278525-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D278525 --- Comment #37 from Anton Shepelev <ant-x@rambler.ru> --- (In reply to alt2600 from comment #36) > you would have to work really hard to get 32bit compat > libraries installed anywhere but /usr/lib32, you would > have to override paths and manually unpackaged yourself > with tar. or manually override a lot of things in a source > build install. My suggestion as promted by: <https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/563156>; If installing lib32 at a non-standard location is as difficult and unlikely as you say, then I agree it need not be handled, and the script can safely probe the hard-coded path. > maybe put a message informing folks to re-run bsdconfig > and ensure the 32bit library distribution packages have > been installed, and install if not. Yes, it would have saved my and other users' time. > also maybe advise them of how to create 64bit only > prefixes, if this was meant to be what they wanted. I for one needed a pure 32-bit prefix. WINE's own documentation explains prefixes very well, including advice to avoid mixed ones. The FreeBSD package, however, lacks an OS- or package- specific message with information overriding or supplementing the official WINE docs. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-278525-7788-lr7aWEbdq1>