From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 31 1:54:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1B14E8B for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca3-136.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.136]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA52171; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 01:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id WAA05103; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 22:50:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 22:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907310550.WAA05103@bubble.didi.com> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Cc: Doug@gorean.org, sheldonh@uunet.co.za, vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <1871.933233844@zippy.cdrom.com> (jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: XFree 3.3.4 not on ftp.freebsd.org? From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Look, we're obviously not going to convince each other with this discussion. I'm sorry I caused you much trouble by adding it without working it with you first, but I believe the current state is workable for both of us. Can we leave it as it is? * 2. Your INDEX files can frequently be out of date with the ports * collection and someone should be able to do their own "make index" * when that happens. There is a "chopindex" script in ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts that anyone can use to clean up the index file (remove extra dependencies, lines for non-existent packages, etc.). * packages and that is simply not [yet] the case. The INDEX file * certainly isn't for the ports - they already get the dependency * information out of the Makefiles - it's for the packages and for * rudimentary search features. It is for all of them, as well as things like the ports web page. The one I commit is simply one with most information -- you can derive the package index from this one, but not the other way around. * To put it another way, consider me as Bruce and this as a really * egregious style(9) bug on your part. You can argue about it forever, * but it won't make you any less wrong in the end. :) If you want to declare yourself Bruce, go ahead. Then I'm going to take your advice about Bruce-filters and take note to your opinion but respectfully stand by my decision, thank you very much. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message