Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 10:50:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206165] resolv.conf(5) is missing documentation on options Message-ID: <bug-206165-7501-NJwhUHnG0A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-206165-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-206165-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206165 Graham Perrin (non-committing) <grahamperrin@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |grahamperrin@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Graham Perrin (non-committing) <grahamperrin@gmail.com> --- Re: <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37086>, the 'patch' keyword (above) can/should be removed. Bug 227147 will gain a hint of: * how to seek bug reports where an attachment is definitely a patch. bcr@ would you like to make yourself the assignee? Also, add the URL of the review to the See also: field. Thanks. (In reply to O. Hartmann from comment #5) This Bugzilla includes more than a thousand non-resolved reports that use the (deprecated) patch keyword. For each such report that is relatively old, there might be any number of reasons for lack of progress. I think, it'll be useful to discuss generally – without singling out this bug 206165 – can I suggest the freebsd-questions mailing list? Or IRC, if you prefer: aim for the #bugs channel. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206165-7501-NJwhUHnG0A>