From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 19 07:25:24 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E485F106564A
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:25:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983318FC0C
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:25:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net
	[70.71.171.106]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0J7PMmT084098
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:25:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:25:14 -0800
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Sippy Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: NTFS in GENERIC: opt-in or opt-out?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:25:25 -0000

Hi,

I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and 
noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS 
module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The 
question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt 
out) in GENERIC? What do people think?

-Maxim