From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Aug 4 15:20:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from snafu.adept.org (adsl-63-193-112-19.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.112.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357C14A2E for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:20:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@snafu.adept.org) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by snafu.adept.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01469; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:18:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins To: Alex Zepeda Cc: Seth , Donald Wilde , Gregory Sutter , Jim Mock , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advocacy site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote: > Uh, yeah. Right. It's *all* their fault. Not the fault of the lazy > masses. Of which I'm a member... that said, and without attempting to thwart any blame... We're all a team (at least I hope we are), so let's get over this together, and try to learn from it. There's a couple of options here... We can work like hell to bring the old advocacy site back, and then stay actively involved in it to keep it up to date... Or, we can help with what's already been proposed, and integrate everything that was on advocacy into the freebsd.org site... giving us one, easily-navigatable, up-to-date, whiz-bang site. Either way, I see a similar need... HELP, from US. Bashing back and forth doesn't get us anywhere. I'll settle this once and for all... it's *my* fault. *All* of it. Settled? Now maybe we can move beyond placing blame, and actually start working on the new site/integration. -Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message