From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 30 12:32:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D022F10656AB for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsjcfm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CA28FC0C for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so6634410obb.13 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:32:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=4lfx94BTpTlNUogBWIu1jjUBdZUGpQGbjyDd+ipl29Y=; b=ig3Qmoi+bI6lskJIjJPGeFQVFmVWIr7ots6J5myKA/8VMVeZPWZJed/jNhzZRq23mD hFobgmH0/7zFKcZBhhFuc82a5oYmUulEnV2o6k+a6JIZQI7QhQptNyteewOZToaHtHG7 wAQe38mZrNrd0B2hE6vlp0r+QfiIDZax1Xvgu10p2E69BF+QWnG/giCjed8tq4ybp4lb bVUpmaiZeCTGgoFfUduzKi7fDtUrtO2Sz4LVXJKgiVnvfFrmONHnfDAxnGgfXTv7B86q VtYtPzvuvsT30ZEQjVBGGza47Tg/M0AvGKaG0MSeTkCd7M+Q+UCUv63v65SmNl5mexEy PU9A== Received: by 10.50.161.198 with SMTP id xu6mr1369982igb.69.1341059536752; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:32:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.239.73 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:31:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FEEF073.9040305@fluffy.khv.ru> References: <201206300950.q5U9oA3k086762@freefall.freebsd.org> <4FEEF073.9040305@fluffy.khv.ru> From: Sayetsky Anton Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:31:56 +0300 Message-ID: To: office@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: ports/168717: editors/libreoffice: does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:32:17 -0000 2012/6/30 Dima Panov : > Think, it's not needed. > Libreoffice 3.5.4.2 builds fine with system boost-1.48 and clang-3.1 > http://fluffy.homeunix.net/tb/index.php?action=describe_port&id=894 You have built 3.5._4_, but there is still 3.5._2_ in ports tree. Is the problem with boost fixed in this release?