From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 3 11:06:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA20646 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 3 Feb 1996 11:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from eel.dataplex.net (EEL.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.245]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA20640 Sat, 3 Feb 1996 11:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [199.183.109.242] (cod [199.183.109.242]) by eel.dataplex.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA27306; Sat, 3 Feb 1996 13:06:25 -0600 X-Sender: rkw@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 13:06:27 -0600 To: Kim Culhan From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: sup is broken? Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >I have been trying for many hours to sup -stable and am becoming >convinced it is not possible. >the sup server became busy. From recent experience this will continue >to back-off in retry time, effectively hanging it for the next several >hours. >Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. I would recommend that EVERYONE interested in -stable use ctm rather than sup. sup REQUIRES that the server be available to you when you request it. ctm can be used as either a "pull" or, preferably, a "push" technology. You can obtain the changes via ftp from our ftp servers or, if you attempt to update frequently (I'd say weekly or more often), you can have the updates automatically mailed to you on a daily basis. Since the daily changes are a file that is often less than 1k bytes, you can see that the traffic is much less. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net