From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 10:34:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAFC16A4CF; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFCB43D2F; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (vs@localhost [127.0.0.1]) iAAAYiES041295; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:44 GMT (envelope-from vs@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from vs@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAAAYhx1041291; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:43 GMT (envelope-from vs) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:43 GMT From: Volker Stolz Message-Id: <200411101034.iAAAYhx1041291@freefall.freebsd.org> To: nistor@snickers.org, vs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, vs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/73749: Port Update net/bmon X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:34:44 -0000 Synopsis: Port Update net/bmon State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: vs State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 10 10:33:44 GMT 2004 State-Changed-Why: Any objections if I simply use INSTALL_PROGRAM instead of the hand-crafted INSTALL-line which does exactly the same thing? Or did I miss anything important? Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs Responsible-Changed-By: vs Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 10 10:33:44 GMT 2004 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll track this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=73749