From owner-ctm-users@freebsd.org Mon Feb 5 21:38:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ctm-users@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD8EF210C for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "land.berklix.org", Issuer "land.berklix.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186408ADEA for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FA3E64.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.250.62.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w15LaxZN014295 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:37:09 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id w15LcHTc096048; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:38:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w15Lbxci021041; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 22:38:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201802052138.w15Lbxci021041@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: possible problem receiving with ctm on current From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 05 Feb 2018 02:42:31 +0000." <3ca0f99c-e5ca-e09d-ba53-ffd03cb7f279@missouri.edu> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:37:59 +0100 X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: CTM User discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:38:30 -0000 "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" wrote: > On 02/04/2018 04:41 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ctm-users@freebsd.org > > A current box was some weeks old, so I just did a make world & now see: > > > > On current box: > > uname -a > > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0: > > Sun Feb 4 03:03:45 CET 2018 > > jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/data/release/s4/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > md5 /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz > > MD5 (/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz) = a3ea38b3d22451ac0653214db5279784 > > > > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz Fatal error: Probably not a CTM-patch at all. > > ctm: exit(65) > > > > gzip -d !$ > > gzip -d /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz > > > > ctm /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383 > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383 Fatal error: Expected CTM keyword. > > Got [CTMSV] > > ctm: exit(65) > > > > & yet svn-cur.06383.xz applied on my older 9.2-RELEASE where I'm up to date > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur svn-cur.06386.xz > > /pub/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN svn-cur 6386 > > /pri/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-SVN svn-cur 6386 > > /usr/svn svn-cur 6386 > > > > my local svn-cur.06383.xz (delivered from freebsd.org mail list) > > has same md5 as that delivered by Stephen's rsync to > > ftp://ctm.berklix.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz > > MD5 (/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.06383.xz) = a3ea38b3d22451ac0653214db5279784 > > > > Anyone else receiving ctm on current see this problem ? > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > > > Did you remember to apply the patch to ctm when you rebuilt everything? > > ftp://ctm.berklix.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/patch-for-ctm-v09 Thanks Stephen, that solved it ! I didn't realise there were still ctm patches not committed to src/ by now. I'm suprised it hadn't bitten me before, so investigated why: { I've been running make world on that box frequently this last half year or more; Sometimes I was rdist'ing my ctms trees from my older 9.2 box; Sometimes I ran ctm of [some] deltas local on the current box. Maybe I didnt notice before that ctm on src & ports may have worked, but on svn/ perhaps failed, & maybe my local rdist updated svn later. Maybe I didnt run ctm on current till after I'd also run my http://berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/customise script which sucked in & applied my src/ patch tree - that turned out to include an obsolete patch-for-ctm-v04 (as your README says, any older & it wouldn't work). I've now included your latest 4 patches in my patch tree http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/usr.sbin/ctm/ so my src/ will get auto. patched. } I think we should get your patches commited, they've had long enough in test ? 16221 Nov 15 2014 patch-for-ctm-v09 878 Sep 24 2012 patch-for-ctm_rmail 583 Dec 25 2011 patch-for-ctm_smail 8655 Nov 15 2014 patch-for-mkctm-v05 Would you like to file a send-pr or should I ? Cheers, Julian -- Julian H. Stacey, Computer Consultant, BSD Linux Unix Systems Engineer, Munich http://berklix.eu/brexit/ UK stole 3,700,000 votes; 700,000 from Brits in EU. Last time Britain denied votes led to American War of Independence. http://berklix.eu/queen/ Petition to get votes back.