From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 20:52:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CF91065670 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7468FC29 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4354170E4; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mA6Kqhg9002351; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:52:44 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Roman Divacky From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:55:12 +0100." <20081106185512.GA33153@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:52:43 +0000 Message-ID: <2350.1226004763@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: c99 compiled world X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:52:46 -0000 In message <20081106185512.GA33153@freebsd.org>, Roman Divacky writes: >hi > >I tried to compile world in C99 (in fact gnu99) gcc mode. It >compiles correctly with two trivial exceptions (in sendmail >and opensolaris) which are going to get fixed soon. > >So, what is your opinion on turning C99 (gnu99) on default in >-current to exposure it to some testing. can you see some drawbacks? I think it is a good idea to avoid regressions. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.