From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 00:22:21 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6443D37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 00:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns3.safety.net (ns3.safety.net [216.40.201.32])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B612C43F3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 00:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cbiffle@safety.net)
Received: from localhost (rs.rackshack.net.safety.net [216.40.201.32])
	by ns3.safety.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h417MJA17241;
	Thu, 1 May 2003 00:22:19 -0700
From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 00:22:50 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <XFMail.20030429124829.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
	<200304301631.59989.a.carter@intrasoft.lu> <3EB03DF9.6171D208@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EB03DF9.6171D208@mindspring.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305010022.50688.cbiffle@safety.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: URGENT HELP REQUIRED
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 07:22:21 -0000

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 02:19 pm, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Kind of makes you want to check in the Makefile that the CPU_TYPE=
> is less than or equal to the current CPU_TYPE from dmesg, when
> doing an "installworld" target.
>
> Patches from people who actually use CPU_TYPE=, anyone?  8-).

That would probably make it difficult for me to compile Athlon kernels on my 
K6.

Yes, I do this.  Don't ask. :-)

Not a horrible idea, however.

-Cliff L. Biffle