From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 30 02:14:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5841065676; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952758FC14; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so9400857pbb.13 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:14:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WxPWaRaLl0o3Y1K51z4K9DmDOa/CE83cpr/yt0tuLaw=; b=wUD0T7icifu6V27OBQaui2iaH++QG8yt4soQkP7SZh9MleCbyMcgRRZnSLUkhnNgLw 95cIgyMc1BDt6EFhZiZxqja57nstiPaWWxV5N88TV5v9B4GJNqHRfiQT0+25lHd7dGgN kEU52EPjeO8Wmf4KUrHx+lKWo5LINe6PWAMI3gymNeZTIAFObLp9S961oKfOGxJ0SCHV Dfy1D9nNmPmjp11q2chfcAct0h4pw+o/qIJL2/miU20PVrIeg7VSr711MWo+UTaljU3F E82sHcj2XYZ6OOL/jSCQTsu2jMtidnsmQkpxy6zmbazm7+ekSEA66r6dtkjJc6vtawa/ vC+Q== Received: by 10.68.194.168 with SMTP id hx8mr31446038pbc.36.1343614482119; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp. [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qd2sm6863720pbb.29.2012.07.29.19.14.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:14:39 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120730.111439.690963122157339031.chat95@mac.com> To: me@janh.de From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <5013248A.2050003@janh.de> References: <20120727.115721.1764309951853442978.chat95@mac.com> <20120727230043.GB48384@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5013248A.2050003@janh.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bapt@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-3 build failure (lingucomponent) and fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 02:14:43 -0000 Hi Jan, I don't matter applying following patch. In otherwords, it's just okay. > .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/libexttextcat/textcat.h) > .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/textcat.h) > LIB_DEPENDS+= exttextcat-1.0.0:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libexttextcat > EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-libexttextcat-lingucomponent > .else > IGNORE= textproc/libexttextcat needs COMPAT_TEXTCAT enabled > .fi > .else > LIB_DEPENDS+= textcat.0:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libtextcat > .fi thanks, Nakata Maho From: Jan Henrik Sylvester Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-3 build failure (lingucomponent) and fix Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:30:18 +0200 > On 07/28/2012 01:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote: >>> Sorry to say, but I cannot reproduce your error. >>> My testbuild was finished succesfully (in my tinder box) >>> on 9.0-RELEASE/amd64. >> >> I do think he should be using libexttextcat with libtextcat >> compatibility >> option. >> >> This change is one of the changes that happended in libexttextcat > > Yes, I do. > > Thank you, Bapt! I was thinking about changing everything non-standard > on my system one-by-one to try to find the reason, but I was still > hesitant because of the work involved. Now you saved me of trying > that. > > I would like to have both libreoffice and openoffice at the same time > and fortunately, using libexttextcat with libtextcat compatibility is > currently the only necessity... and that patch. > > Does the patch hurt those with standard libtextcat? > > If not, would you include it, although it does not fix the > clean/tinderbox case? > > Or better: Would you accept a patch for the openoffice port that > detects if libexttextcat with libtextcat compatibility is installed > instead of libtextcat, properly depend on it in that case, and include > the patch? > > I am thinking of something along this lines (untested): > > .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/libexttextcat/textcat.h) > .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/include/textcat.h) > LIB_DEPENDS+= exttextcat-1.0.0:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libexttextcat > EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-libexttextcat-lingucomponent > .else > IGNORE= textproc/libexttextcat needs COMPAT_TEXTCAT enabled > .fi > .else > LIB_DEPENDS+= textcat.0:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/libtextcat > .fi > > Cheers, > Jan Henrik >