From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Apr 12 01:52:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA21871
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 01:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (gatekeeper.barcode.co.il [192.116.93.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA21852
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 01:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nadav@localhost) by gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA07740; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:48:28 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:48:28 +0300 (IDT)
From: Nadav Eiron <nadav@barcode.co.il>
To: Anthony Barlow <tony@warp.co.uk>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Death Ping & 2.1.7.1R
In-Reply-To: <199704111758.TAA07512@www.warp.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970412114803.7693D-100000@gatekeeper.barcode.co.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Anthony Barlow wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I'm a little concerned with the problems people have been experiancing with
> SCSI on FBSD 2.2.1R. Is 2.1.7.1R suceptable to the 'death ping' I recall in
> an early message that 2.2.1 wasn't.
> 
> Regards,
> Anthony
> 
2.1.7R should be immune to the ping of death. I think 2.1.0R and up are.

Nadav