Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:58:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194245] [MAINTAINER] www/typo3-lts: update to 6.2.5 Message-ID: <bug-194245-13-kaeMVnxN3R@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194245-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194245-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194245 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #10 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Helmut Ritter from comment #9) > Actually I use a VM with a single CPU with 256MB of RAM. I never heard about > poudriere before so I had to google it. I'm no sysadmin, I even don't > remember when and how I inherited the maintainership of Typo3. 5G reference the virtual disk size but 256M RAM is probably too low. Unless the VM is seriously beefy (e.g. 40G hard disk, 768M or 1G RAM) then yes, your actual resources are probably too low. > So the resources I'm talking about is time to install poudriere, this takes less 1 minute even to build from source > read a handbook, set up the system, and so on - *this* is the problem. Adequate (IMO) how-to guides don't exist. Riggs@ was going to write one, I need to see where he is on that. > to maintain one single port that copies over the source tarball to /usr/local/www and adjusts some > permissions. For a port that I even do not use at all. > > > You said you didn't want to provide the logs. You aren't required to, > > so really that's the end of the story. > > Quote where I did so. JRM: "P.S. please provide poudriere logs with future patches, if at all possible." You: "I neither use poudriere, nor do I have ressources to do so" I think reasonable minds interpret that response as "I don't want to" or at least, "I can't". > To the contrary I asked you what I can do to support you (apart from > poudiere logs) and you refused the answer. THAT might be the end of the > story. Because there is nothing equivalent to poudriere. Not redports, not tinderbox, not local building, not DEVEOPER_MODE=yes > So to get back on-topic, is there anything that I can provide to help > committers apart from poudriere? Would the output of porttools help? No. A slight improvement would be the outputs of # make check-plist # make stage-qa # portlint That's better than nothing. It's probably good enough for a port that just copies files instead of building. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194245-13-kaeMVnxN3R>