From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 13 12:34:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79B91065742 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390128FC13 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [89.24.230.136] (89-24-230-136.i4g.tmcz.cz [89.24.230.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2DCYNoe023114; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:34:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <49BA52D2.8090209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:34:26 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200903120954.n2C9s2ev063133@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090313023956.GA49511@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20090313023956.GA49511@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.742 () AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 89.24.230.136; Sender-helo: [89.24.230.136]; ) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Sergey A. Osokin" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:34:39 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC >> FreeBSD ports repository >> Modified files: >> shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist >> Log: >> Fix pkg-plist. >> Bump PORTREVISION. > > Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much appreciated), but why did you bump > PORTREVISION for a PLIST change? > > There is zero reason to force a reinstall for a PLIST change. Either the > port is already installed (and the user can wait for some other reason to > update), or the port isn't installed and bumping PORTREVISION does > nothing. It's needed for package cluster, otherwise it does not know to rebuild and will serve incomplete package forever. Pav