From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 25 14:30:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CF73B37B401; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 32B1343F93; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 282672ED44B; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:30:16 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>
Message-ID: <20030725213016.GZ42924@elvis.mu.org>
References: <20030722231656.GA9715@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
	<16474.1058916504@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<20030725212142.GB9176@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030725212142.GB9176@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_malloc.c md5c.c
	subr_autoconf.c subr_mbuf.c subr_prf.c tty_subr.c vfs_cluster.c
	vfs_subr.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:30:19 -0000

* Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> [030725 14:21] wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:28:24AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >Please remember that the problem at hand is getting -Werror back
> >on the kernel so we can catch issues like the warning in umtx.
> 
> Why is -Werror such a holy grail?  The warnings are still there -
> developers should be able to use script(1) or output redirection and
> grep(1) to find them.  Not having -Werror has the benefit that you get
> to see all the warnings and make doesn't just die at the first error.

Not having -Werror is stupid.  Please.  It wastes so much damn time
when you accidentally miss some warning emitted.

Your arguement wastes developer time and makes it more irritating to
work on a system that should be fun to work on.

-Alfred