From owner-cvs-sys Mon Jun 8 06:02:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA07736 for cvs-sys-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 06:02:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-sys) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA07536; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA15937; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:23:32 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199806081123.NAA15937@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa/snd ad1848.c sb_dsp.c sound.c To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 13:23:31 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: eivind@yes.no, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <21704.897309227@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jun 8, 98 05:33:28 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The problem is in the fact that the snd drivers is imported with files > > named the same as the sound/ files, and thus don't get compiled during > > LINT. This is bogus. > > Aha, thanks for pointing this out - you're right. I uncommented pcm0 > and all the audio drivers under the impression that it would cause > pcm0 to be built as well but now that you mention it, of course, I > find that to be totally untrue. Feh. Since nobody's even supporting i don't have any problem in renaming files, but don't see any practical purpose (other than testing) since this is two different drivers for the same hardware and cannot do anything good at runtime. > the "old" audio driver anymore, perhaps we should just bite the bullet > and migrate for -current? Some people will miss their FM support, but what do you mean by 'migrate', if it is just a change in LINT (and ANTILINT as Eivind suggested) then it is no big deal. Perhaps we (you! i don't run current) should poll how many users use one or the other driver and decide on basing on those numbers. > hopefully also enough to help Luigi incorporate that support into his you are very optimistic, Jordan. For people in the need of FM it is much easier to use the old stuff and use the awe driver. the reason why i wrote the driver was that i did not have an alternative for full duplex on the audio cards available here, if i did probably i'd use my time on something else cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ > driver. Even with reduced functionality, there's a lot to be said > for a driver that's actively maintained vs one which is not. As > > - Jordan >